![]() ![]() Again, longer tests with larger data sets should reveal more. Running the test three times in a row took longer in one of the three instances I performed, but that could be affected by anything, so the light blue bars are more important here, I believe. When it comes to serving a LAN client, some differences start popping up, confirming that database modifications are definitely affected by the infamous startup restoration feature introduced in FileMaker Server 18: It seems that the Draco engine itself, which is the same in both FileMaker Pro and FileMaker Server, performs equally in all these versions: So how does the latest version compare to 18 and the initial release of 19? I am eager to see what my following tests with larger data sets and higher number of concurrencies reveal.įileMaker 19 vs FileMaker 19 vs FileMaker 18įileMaker Server 19.1.2 is primarily a stability and reliability focused release, so many customers were waiting for it and delaying their upgrade to FileMaker 19. It seems that the on-premise Linux version of FileMaker Server definitely deserves some attention from the performance perspective, especially for larger deployments with many concurrent users. And that’s where it starts to be interesting… What is the most important for a server software, however, is how it performs for multiple users. When I executed the test on server, it started showing that FileMaker Server may be performing slightly better on Linux than it is on Windows. Running the test over LAN from a 13-inch MacBook Pro (late 2015) took about the same time with both Linux and Windows version of FileMaker Server:īut it seems that here most of the execution time was consumed by the client, which was still the same. The test where I could find the biggest differences was modifying all the 1000 records either via Replace Field Contents, or using Set Field in a loop. Most of my tests did not reveal any significant difference between Linux and Windows yet, but I have to admit that 1000 records was too small data set to actually show something as many tests completed in less than a second. In addition to being better priced than Windows especially for hosting providers, Linux has some advantages for technically savvy server administrators, such as command-line control over SSH, not mentioning some core technologies the system is based on. Specifically, the distribution supported and recommended for this version is CentOS Linux 7.8. One of the long awaited features that FileMaker Server 19.1.2 finally turned to reality is the support for on-premise Linux installations. I just could not include the macOS version of FileMaker Server any more, because the minimum maOS version supported by FileMaker Server 19 is 10.14 Mojave and the latest version I could make reliably work on that machine was 10.13 High Sierra.įor now I have performed just a short series of tests, mostly with just 1000 records, using FileMaker Server 18v4 and later, but once I have the complete full test done, I will make the comparison with the old results as well, comparing the latest version of FileMaker with all the previous versions back to FileMaker 12. In order to be able to compare my test results even with the oldest results of my tests I performed on previous versions of FileMaker, I kept using the same test machine as in previous years, the Mac Pro (early 2008). Linux version seems slightly faster than Windows version, JavaScript is way faster than FileMaker calculation engine, and sorting on server can surprise you as much as it has surprised me. I have added these new versions to my performance lab and here are my first test results. It also finally brings version for Linux. ![]() The new FileMaker Pro brings some great new features and the new version of FileMaker Server is supposed to be more stable and faster. Claris has recently released FileMaker Pro 19.1.3 and FileMaker Server 19.1.2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |